Microsoft adds doubt to Google Phone success
30 July 2007 - 12:08
Honestly, first Forbes and now Microsoft - Google’s cellphone software engineers are taking a beating lately, as pundits and providers alike take issue with the company’s potential move into providing handset OS and applications. Today it’s the turn of Bill Gates - normally so shy and retiring - who is reported as saying of Google’s ambitions:
“They’ve introduced about 30 different products; they have one profit-making product. So you’re now making a prediction without ever seeing the software that they’re going to have the world’s best phone and it’s going to be free?”
Commenting to the New York Times, Gates seemed confident that Microsoft’s 10-percent share of the mobile OS market was unlikely to be threatened by anything Google could conjure.
“The phone is becoming way more software intensive, and to be able to say that there’s some challenge for us in the phone market when its becoming software-intensive, I don’t see that” Bill Gates
To be honest, I partially share that prediction. Not because I don’t think Google has the skill or determination to put together a cellphone software package, but because I don’t think they’d deign to compete on Microsoft’s terms. The handsets that use the Windows Mobile OS are all smartphones of one sort or another, and from Google’s past form they’d be more likely to aim for the (bigger) consumer market.
4 Comments | Tags: Google Phone, Microsoft



30 Jul 2007 - 13:35
Well, remember when Billy said “Internet will fail” ? Google have the $$$ power to push their product and Google have the brightest mind in their staff lineup (that’s why many firm said it is hard to recruit great talent since Google hog them all)
But again, Google Phone is still vapor ware, we’ll just have to wait and see
08 Aug 2007 - 0:59
also, google has an entirely different strategy than most when it comes to, just about anything, they keep it simple
type in google.com and then type in yahoo.com or microsoft.com
compare the load times, then compare the amount of extraneous BS from one site to the next, and then compare functionality
not only does google keep it simple (stupid) but they don’t lack any functionality compared to their competitors, in fact they offer up far more functionality
so i definitely think they have (or can buy) what it takes to edge Microsoft out of some market share even though phones are going a bit to the software side of things
08 Aug 2007 - 23:46
There are so much crap on the net nowadays, the KISS method is great.
10 Sep 2007 - 2:15
What is the KISS method? @ Vincent.